I know this argument has been done to death, but why have the people in favor of limiting Wikipedia won? Yes, one of the advantages of Wikipedia is that it can be updated more quickly than an ordinary encyclopedia, but why should that be the only advantage? Seeing as how it is on the internet, there is very little additional cost for additional information; why is notability even an issue? You can argue that too many stubs makes it harder to find information, but I can argue that stubs are more likely to become articles if they actually exist.* And if you want information to be easier to find, don’t categories help? Why delete categories just because there aren’t very many entries? Or because you don’t consider them to be important?

Get over yourselves, Wikipedia editors, is what I’m saying.

At least the List of Space Pirates is still up.

*citation needed, but come on, which is easier, adding a new topic or updating one?